. >> the doping allegations arose in a case brought by lance armstrong against an insurer based in dallas, texas, who provided huge bonuses paid to armstrong for winning the tour de france in successive years. >> these are the checks making the first two payments under the contract. these checks represent when he won on fourth and fifth making the payments for $1.5 million and then $3 million. obviously -- >> this attorney represented the insurer who refused to pay a further $5 million when armstrong won his sixth tour de france in 2004. >> obviously, no one what want to guarantee a payment to an vent that was fixed or to someone who is cheating because that's a risk no one would take. >> was it fixed? >> well, my client and we think now the evidence clearly shows that lance armstrong was, in fact, using performance enhancing drugs for both the fourth, fifth, and sieveth tour de france races which are the ones my clients have risk on. the evidence we developed showed he had been using performance enhancing drugs long before we ever got involved dating back to the beginning of his career.